Event 2
Before attending Linda Wintraub’s workshop
on April 19 2017, I did not realize how isolated we are from the nature.
Wintraub started the workshop with a story: a teacher took her students to a
beach for the first time in their lives but they ended up disappointed because
the students did not know how to walk on a soft surface like the beach. I was
shocked by how. the students had lost the ability to adapt to different
surfaces because had only been to man-made places and walked on man-made roads.
That
story got me to think about how long I have been away from the nature. As
Wintraub introduced her idea of how materialism is becoming more dominant of
people’s mental world and how people are “disabled” to interact with the
nature, it reminded me of the article “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical
Reproduction” by Walter Benjamin. Benjamin argued in his article about how mass
production has made artworks to lose their “aura” or their uniqueness. If we
think about human beings as unique artworks of the nature and genetics, are the
modern facilities depriving us of uniqueness by making the various environments
human beings used to reside in more and more similar?
With
those thoughts in mind, I entered the interactive exhibition. I left my bag
outside of the exhibition and only brought my senses with me, like Wintraub
suggested. There were five areas in the room and each presented about one area
of perception and sensation. Each area was composed of several boxes that would
introduce different tasks or thought-provoking questions.
Layout
of the exhibition
For
example, in the section about touch and texture, there was one box that asked
me to explore some feathers with touch and to think about their different
functions.
Instructions
on the box
Feathers
in the box
The
feature at the bottom right was very light and thin, so I thought it would be
for decoration or mate attraction. The other two feathers felt denser and thick
and therefore they might be water proof and function to keep the bird warm. As
I was impressed by how these different feathers might cooperate to provide a
bird with protection from frigidity and the capacity to fly, I was also
reminded of a fact I learned in high school biology class: some bones of a bird
are hollow so that they can support the bird’s body structure while minimizing the
bird’s weight.
To enable
flying, a bird has such intricate designs in its body and we just cannot
imagine how evolution has created so many various species with different skills
and body structures for survival. Think about how many centuries passed before civilizations
of human beings invented machines that can fly reliably for a long distance.
Moreover, while humming birds can fly 383 times its body length each second, a
space shuttle can only fly up to 207 times its body length per second during
atmospheric re-entry.
A humming
bird
From
the comparison between birds and planes, I then thought about unit 3 where
professor Vesna introduced robotics and art. Just like how planes cannot
compare to birds in terms of flight skills, there are still numerous things that
even the latest robots cannot accomplish, such as making a movie. Therefore, it
might be questionable how far the Japanese robots designed to care for the
elderly can go. In addition, the idea of implanting chips into human bodies
like Eduardo Kac (introduced in unit 4) did might actually be an option.
Considering from the perspective of biotechnology introduced in unit 6,
incorporating mechanic parts into human bodies might be an easy and fast way to
make use of our genetics, one of the most valuable gifts from the nature. We
might indeed be able to invent an ideal human being by modifying undesirable
traits from the level of genetics or by replacing body parts that do not
function properly.
Eduardo
Kac implanting the chip
Ethical
issues are definitely important to consider for this type of project that
almost transform human beings in to machines. In addition, animal bionics seem
like a much reasonable and quite effective alternative. Therefore, future
explorations by artists and scientists on medical technology, biotechnology,
and robotics will hopefully give us clearer directions in terms of the future
of robotics and machinery.
I
personally benefitted much from attending the event by Wintraub. Not only did I
have the precious opportunity to re-connect with the nature, I was also able to
re-consider some topics we have discussed in the course. I would definitely
recommend this project to anyone who loves interacting with the nature and
those who want inspiration on mass production, machines, and the relationship
between the nature and the man-made world.
Linda
Wintraub and I at the exhibition
Event link: http://dma.ucla.edu/events/calendar/?ID=1029
Works Cited
Benjamin,
Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” Walter
Benjamin. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 May 2017.
<https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm>.
Borland,
Sophie. “Side by side, how the humble hummingbird flies faster than a fighter
jet.” Daily Mail Online. Associated Newspapers, 11 June 2009. Web. 13 May
2017.
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1192013/Side-humble-hummingbird-flies-faster-fighter-jet.html>.
Feathers in a box
in the exhibition, UCLA Art|Sci Gallery. Personal photograph by author. 2017.
Instructions on a
box in the exhibition, UCLA Art|Sci Gallery. Personal photograph by author. 2017.
Layout of Linda
Wintraub's exhibition, UCLA Art|Sci Gallery. Personal photograph by author. 2017.
Linda Wintraub and
I, UCLA Art|Sci Gallery. Personal photograph by author. 2017.
Rossouw, Jonathan. Golden-tailed sapphires prefer
the subtropical or tropical moist lowland, montane and heavily degraded former
forests in Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Trinidad and Tobago and
Venezuela. N.d. Top 25 Wild Bird Photographs of the Week #55. Web. 14 May 2017.
<http://voices.nationalgeographic.com/2013/12/01/top-25-wild-bird-photographs-of-the-week-55/>.
The moment of the
implant as seen live on television and on the Web. N.d. TIME CAPSULE. By Eduardo Kac. Web. 14 May 2017.
<http://ekac.org/arcobeep.html>.
Vesna,
Victoria. “Biotech intro NEW.” Uploaded by
uconlineprogram, 26 Mar. 2012, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fvp924_pbgc#action=share.
Vesna,
Victoria. “Medicine pt3.” Youtube, Uploaded by uconlineprogram, 22 Apr. 2012, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIX-9mXd3Y4#action=share.
Vesna, Victoria, and Machiko Kusahara. “Robotics
MachikoKusahara 1.” Youtube, Uploaded by uconlineprogram, 14 Apr.
2012, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQZ_sy-mdEU#action=share.
Comments
Post a Comment